Malaria and insecticide treated bednets Print E-mail

Malaria bednets are effective 

The burden of malaria is one that weighs heavily on Africa’s development: it is responsible for a high child mortality – 25% of all child deaths in sub-Saharan Africa – and it has also a strongly negative impact on economic growth. A study by Jeffrey Sachs revealed: “Malaria and poverty are intimately connected. Controlling for factors such as tropical location, colonial history, and geographical isolation, countries with intensive malaria had income levels in 1995 of only 33% that of countries without malaria, whether or not the countries were in Africa.” 

 

 

Malaria and insecticide-treated (bed) nets (ITNs)


After some setbacks in the 1980s and 1990s (reduction of DDT use, resistances against common anti-malaria drugs), there is again progress in the fight against malaria. There are significantly more funds available to combat malaria, new drugs are becoming available and the discovery of insecticide-treated bednets (ITNs) has lead to renewed malaria prevention. Several large-scale studies have documented the beneficial impact of ITNs on malaria disease and on child-mortality.

ITNs have a smart double-impact:

a) they protect those sleeping under the net from mosquito bites – Anopheles mosquitoes bite at night only – and thus reduce the under-five mortality by about 20 per cent;

b) they kill the mosquitoes which touch the netting and thus reduce their number drastically. This second effect has also a strong community impact, as those people not sleeping under a net are benefiting as well. Overall, more than half a million deaths could be avoided every year if most children in sub-Saharan Africa could be protected.


From studies to implementation: dissemination challenges

With numerous studies showing such positive results, how could a successful dissemination strategy be implemented? Is it simply a matter of distributing free bednets to everybody in the same manner as for example vaccines are given out for free in clinics? Should dissemination focus on the most vulnerable groups (namely children under five years) or target the whole population? Is there a need for a more holistic programme including community health and awareness creation? These were some questions raised by research teams and early implementers. These questions also pointed out the importance of distinguishing between efficacy and effectiveness of a public health intervention: while scientific studies had shown the efficacy of ITNs under very controlled conditions, there was uncertainty that the same interventions would also be effective under real-life delivery conditions.
 

 

.

Download the study (2 MB)